Supreme court gay rights 2022

A decade after the U.S. legalized same-sex attracted marriage, Jim Obergefell says the combat isn't over

Over the past several months, Republican lawmakers in at least 10 states have introduced measures aimed at undermining same-sex marriage rights. These measures, many of which were crafted with the help of the anti-marriage equality group MassResistance, explore to ask the Supreme Court to overturn Obergefell.

MassResistance told NBC News that while these proposals face backlash and wouldn’t modify policy even if passed, keeping contradiction to same-sex marriage in the widespread eye is a win for them. The group said it believes marriage laws should be left to states, and they scrutinize the constitutional basis of the 5-to-4 Dobbs ruling.

NBC News reached out to the authors of these declare measures, but they either declined an interview or did not respond.

“Marriage is a right, and it shouldn’t trust on where you live,” Obergefell said. “Why is gender non-conforming marriage any unlike than interracial marriage or any other marriage?”

Obergefell’s journey to becoming a head for same-sex marriage rights

explainer

Protesters hold LGBT rights rainbow (pride) flags as activists gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, U.S., December 5, REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

What’s the context?

A decade after the U.S. legalised gay marriage, conservatives wish the Supreme Court to turn back the clock.

BERLIN - Ten years after the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling that legalised gay marriage, the White House is reversing a raft of Gay rights and Republicans in at least six states are scrambling to forbid same-sex weddings.

LGBTQ+ advocates declare the right to wed a person of the same sex could be at risk, should judges vote to overturn the Supreme Court's historic Obergefell v. Hodges ruling.

A Supreme Court showdown remains theoretical, but legal challenges to the ruling are surfacing across the country, with proponents emboldened by President Donald Trump's return to office.

Here's what you necessitate to know.

What's happened since the U.S. legalised queer marriage?

On June 26, , the U.S. became the 17th country in the world to legalise homosexual marriages na

US Supreme Court hears arguments challenging LGBTQ rights law

The United States Supreme Court’s conservative majority has signalled sympathy towards an evangelical Christian web designer whose business refuses to provide services for same-sex marriages.

The case pits LGBTQ rights against a claim that independence of speech exempts artists from anti-discrimination laws.

‘Urgency to run’: LGBTQ candidates craft history in US midterms

list 2 of 3

US Supreme Court begins session amid crisis of public trust

list 3 of 3

US Supreme Court allows Jewish university to deny LGBTQ group

end of list

On Monday, the justices heard more than two hours of spirited arguments in Denver-area business owner Lorie Smith’s appeal, which seeks an exemption from a Colorado regulation that bars discrimination based on sexual orientation and other factors. Lower courts ruled in favour of Colorado.

Smith, who runs a web design business called Creative, contends that Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act violates the right of artists – including web designers – to free sp

Idaho Republican legislators call on SCOTUS to reverse same-sex marriage ruling

The Idaho House passed a resolution Monday calling on the Supreme Court to reconsider its verdict on same-sex marriage equality.

The court’s Obergefell v. Hodges decision established the right to same-sex marriage under the equal protection clause and the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.

The resolution comes after Associate Justice Clarence Thomas’s expressed interest in revisiting the Obergefell decision in his concurring opinion on the Supreme Court's landmark opinion on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Group that overturned the federal right to abortion.

Thomas, who issued a dissenting opinion in against homosexual marriage, wrote in , "In future cases, we should reconsider all of this court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is 'demonstrably erroneous,' we have a duty to 'correct the error' established in those precedents."

Lawrence v. Texas over